Cringely and Fred Gibbons on carried interest tax proposals in the U.S. -- missing the big picture
Robert X. Cringely ( http://www.cringely.com/2010/05/carried-away/ ) and Fred Gibbons ( http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2010/05/why-taxing-carried-interest-as-ordinary-income-is-good-policy.html ) write in support of taxing carried interests as income in the U.S.
Cringely ends with "We need a better idea."
I ask, a better idea to do what? To take more money from venture capitalists?
What makes us think that giving the money to the government is better for the economy than leaving things as they are. Is the government becoming more efficient in using the resources it takes from people? Have they improved their efficiency the way Wal-Mart has in the past decades?
Financially-saavy folks, while still irrational, do respond to incentives more readily. This, in any form, sounds like a huge incentive for them to leave the U.S.
The U.S. lost its international lead in IPO's in the last decade (thank you, Sarbannes-Oxley). Now it looks like the government will help the U.S. lose its international lead in venture capital in this decade.
At least this comment attributed to Michael Arrington, reminds Fred on this:
"I agree with you on this Fred, it's simply not logical to tax carried interest as capital gains. But on a more fundamental level I completely disagree. Our government wastes so much money and our politicians are so...bad...at governing that I cringe every time someone wealthy starts talking about how they need to pay more taxes..."